Tools
Carbon Capture Costs: FEED & pre-FEED Cost Reports
Carbon capture costs from pre-FEED and FEED studies across power, cement, steel, natural gas, hydrogen and other industrial sectors. Browse capital (capex) and operating (opex) cost estimates from publicly available engineering reports, drill down into cost buckets and line items, and compare up to three projects side-by-side.
Comparing 3 reports — tab selection applies to every column.
Cleveland Cliffs / Burns Harbor
CO₂ captured
2,800,000t/yr
Capture efficiency
95.0%
Utilization
—
Parasitic load
79MW
CO₂ concentration
21.9%vol%
Facility scope
EngineeringDastur International
Point source approachPost-Combustion Capture
CO₂ concentration21.9% vol%
Flue gas pressure17 psia
Compressor nameplate—
Compression stages6
Compression inlet—
Compression discharge2,215 psia
Description
Dastur International Inc., with Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., is designing a carbon capture system for the 5 mtpa integrated steel plant in Burns Harbor, Indiana, to capture 50–70% of CO₂ emissions from blast furnace gas. The system will combine a gas flow distribution network, a specialized conditioning process, and ION Clean Energy’s solvent-based capture technology with 90–98% efficiency, with water-gas shift reactors enabling higher capture rates. Dastur will lead overall plant integration and engineering, while ION designs the capture island and Dastur Energy optimizes design and energy performance.
Devon Energy / Jackfish-1 Oil Sands
CO₂ captured
365,000t/yr
Capture efficiency
90.0%
Utilization
85.0%
Parasitic load
—MW
CO₂ concentration
8.6%mol%
Facility scope
EngineeringHTC Puretech
Point source approachPost-Combustion Capture
CO₂ concentration8.6% mol%
Flue gas pressure15 psia
Compressor nameplate—
Compression stages—
Compression inlet—
Compression discharge—
Description
A Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) study was undertaken to design an advanced CO2 Capture
Unit (CCU) to produce 1000 tonnes per day of CO2 from the exhaust of three Once-Through Steam
Generators (OTSG’s) at Devon Energy’s Jackfish 1 thermal in-situ operations and estimate the capital
expenditure for the facilities within +/-15% accuracy.
The process utilizes HTC Purenergy Carbon Capture Technology to capture CO2 from the OTSG exhaust
gas using an aqueous chemical solvent in an absorber tower, after which the CO2-loaded solvent is
passed to a stripper tower where the CO2 is released and the solvent regenerated. The study excludes
downstream CO2 compression, dehydration, transportation and storage.
Mustang Station Power Plant
CO₂ captured
853,644t/yr
Capture efficiency
90.0%
Utilization
52.0%
Parasitic load
46MW
CO₂ concentration
3.8%vol%
Facility scope
EngineeringAECOM
Point source approachPost-Combustion Capture
CO₂ concentration3.8% vol%
Flue gas pressure14 psia
Compressor nameplate—
Compression stages3
Compression inlet75 psia
Compression discharge2,015 psia
Description
The University of Texas at Austin, with AECOM Technical Services and Trimeric Corporation, is conducting a FEED study for the Piperazine Advanced Stripper (PZAS) CO₂ capture process at Golden Spread Electric Cooperative’s Mustang Station in Denver City, Texas. Designed for two GE gas turbines with HRSGs and a steam turbine totaling 464 MWe, the PZAS process uses 30 wt% piperazine for higher efficiency, solvent stability, smaller absorber size, and cost savings compared to conventional amine systems. The project will deliver a 30–60% complete design package and a capital cost estimate with ±15% accuracy.