Tools

Carbon Capture Costs: FEED & pre-FEED Cost Reports

Carbon capture costs from pre-FEED and FEED studies across power, cement, steel, natural gas, hydrogen and other industrial sectors. Browse capital (capex) and operating (opex) cost estimates from publicly available engineering reports, drill down into cost buckets and line items, and compare up to three projects side-by-side.

3 of 3 selectedClear selection46 reports
Comparing 3 reports — tab selection applies to every column.

Gerald Gentleman Station

CoalFEED· ION Clean Energy· 2023-03-01Project page ↗Cost report ↗
CO₂ captured
4,316,020t/yr
Capture efficiency
89.8%
Utilization
85.0%
Parasitic load
MW
CO₂ concentration
Facility scope
EngineeringSargent & Lundy
Point source approachPost-Combustion Capture
CO₂ concentration
Flue gas pressure
Compressor nameplate
Compression stages6
Compression inlet
Compression discharge2,115 psia
Description
ION Clean Energy, with Nebraska Public Power District, is conducting a FEED study to retrofit a CO₂ capture system on Unit 2 of the 700 MWe Gerald Gentleman Station in Nebraska. Using ION’s low-aqueous ICE-21 solvent, proven in prior DOE-funded projects to reduce energy use, solvent degradation, and emissions, the design will feature two parallel 350 MWe capture units. The project aims to decarbonize most of Unit 2 while maintaining maximum operational flexibility for the plant.

Southern Company / Plant Daniel

Natural GasFEED· Southern Company· 2022-11-30Project page ↗Cost report ↗
CO₂ captured
1,769,520t/yr
Capture efficiency
90.0%
Utilization
Parasitic load
79MW
CO₂ concentration
Facility scope
EngineeringLinde Engineering (ISBL), Southern Company Services (OSBL)
Point source approachPost-Combustion Capture
CO₂ concentration
Flue gas pressure15 psia
Compressor nameplate
Compression stages
Compression inlet
Compression discharge
Description
Southern Company Services, with Linde Gas North America, is conducting a FEED study for a commercial-scale CO₂ capture system using Linde-BASF’s advanced aqueous amine technology at an NGCC plant of at least 375 MWe. The project will evaluate Alabama Power’s Plant Barry and Mississippi Power’s Plant Daniel to select the optimal host site, define project requirements, optimize process design, and deliver engineering packages along with a cost and schedule estimate within 15% accuracy. The study will build on prior feasibility work and site-specific testing.

Finnish Market Pulp Mill / Capture of CO2 in the Multi-fuel Boiler only

Pulp and Paperpre-FEED· VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland· 2016-12-01Project page ↗Cost report ↗
CO₂ captured
270,658t/yr
Capture efficiency
90.0%
Utilization
95.9%
Parasitic load
4.4MW
CO₂ concentration
16.8%mol%
Facility scope
Engineering
Point source approachPost-Combustion Capture
CO₂ concentration16.8% mol%
Flue gas pressure
Compressor nameplate
Compression stages4
Compression inlet
Compression discharge1,595 psia
Description
Analysis sets the design and cost-estimating basis for evaluating pulp and board mills with and without CCS. Two base cases are considered: a market pulp mill and an integrated pulp and board mill. Six CCS cases are evaluated, capturing CO₂ from the recovery boiler, multi-fuel boiler, lime kiln, or their combinations. The mills are assumed to be energy independent, with black liquor and bark burned to produce steam and electricity, and excess electricity exported to the grid. The CO₂ capture system uses post-combustion MEA technology with a 90% capture rate, and if on-site electricity is insufficient, an auxiliary boiler firing forest residues will supply the additional energy. Capture of CO2 in the Multi-fuel Boiler only